 |
| from here and here |
I guess that we really shouldn't be surprised Apple took the teeth out of it's earlier move to clamp down on invasive ad-tech. They do whatever they feel like they can get away with, and in all likelihood they will be able to get away with this just fine. Their near monopoly position makes it basically inevitable that people will continue to buy their products regardless of their failure to live up to their promise of providing control.
 |
| from here and here (image source) |
Apple's CSAM (child sexual abuse material) scanning plans may now be paused, but paused isn't the same as stopped, and if they really think it's an advancement in privacy then it's important to recognize the distinction between paused and stopped.
In no world is adding surveillance where none previously existed an advancement in privacy, no matter how favourably it may compare to what others are doing. Furthermore, if your plan involves trying to work around the problem of encryption then you are once again not advancing privacy because, when it comes to privacy, encryption is not a problem that needs a work-around.
They still plan to go forward with this one way or another. They're just slowing down to consider how to take the bite out of the criticisms against it so that they can still pretend like they care about your privacy.
 |
| from here and here |
