![]() |
| from here and here |
Fraudulently reporting sites as malware seems like the kind of scam that should be obviously illegal. I'm not sure how the consequences of his actions haven't caught up to him yet.
![]() |
| from here and here |
Fraudulently reporting sites as malware seems like the kind of scam that should be obviously illegal. I'm not sure how the consequences of his actions haven't caught up to him yet.
![]() |
| from here and here |
Leave it to the "Don't be evil" company to continue to find new ways to be evil. And yes, I know that politicians would in fact try to spam and scam us. The former president and grifter-in-chief already has scammed people by email under the ruse of fighting the election results.
As of writing, there's still time to voice your concerns to the FEC (by email it seems - ao@fec.gov)
| from here and here |
I guess that we really shouldn't be surprised Apple took the teeth out of it's earlier move to clamp down on invasive ad-tech. They do whatever they feel like they can get away with, and in all likelihood they will be able to get away with this just fine. Their near monopoly position makes it basically inevitable that people will continue to buy their products regardless of their failure to live up to their promise of providing control.
| from here and here |
Given Verizon's blatant disregard for their customers' preferences, I think the lesson here is that there's only one kind of opt-out that matters - the one you do with your wallet. Don't give them your business if they can't live up to basic expectations of privacy.
![]() |
| from here and here |
If it sounds like Mark Zuckerberg is pulling a fast one by claiming Facebook won't use face recognition anymore but under their new name they will continue to use it, then you are not alone. It seems a bit like a bait and switch scam.
![]() |
| from here and here |
It appears that Facebook Marketplace is a trash fire with too many scams and too little oversight. Banning people who volunteer their time and effort to help is just the tip of the iceberg.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
Apple's CSAM (child sexual abuse material) scanning plans may now be paused, but paused isn't the same as stopped, and if they really think it's an advancement in privacy then it's important to recognize the distinction between paused and stopped.
In no world is adding surveillance where none previously existed an advancement in privacy, no matter how favourably it may compare to what others are doing. Furthermore, if your plan involves trying to work around the problem of encryption then you are once again not advancing privacy because, when it comes to privacy, encryption is not a problem that needs a work-around.
They still plan to go forward with this one way or another. They're just slowing down to consider how to take the bite out of the criticisms against it so that they can still pretend like they care about your privacy.
![]() |
| from here and here |
Y'know what? If I wanted to share my Internet with my neighbors, I'd give them the wifi password. Amazon seems to not understand property or consent here, and I'm not sure how this plan made it past their legal department. The amount of bad will this will create in their customers is going to be mind boggling.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
![]() |
| from here and here |
![]() |
| from here and here |
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
![]() |
| from here (image source) |
![]() |
| found on Reddit |
![]() |
| from here and here |
![]() |
| from here (source image) |
![]() |
| from here (source article) |
![]() |
| from here |
![]() |
| from here (source image) |
![]() |
| from here (source image one, two, and three) |