![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
Maybe the different outcomes are enough to teach the ex-bike-owners some principles about how to better secure their bikes. Like making sure the lock actually goes through every part of the bike.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
Maybe the different outcomes are enough to teach the ex-bike-owners some principles about how to better secure their bikes. Like making sure the lock actually goes through every part of the bike.
![]() |
| found on 9gag |
You may not agree but it's hard to argue with results. This bike would have been stolen if not for the actions of that neighbour.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
I don't see any opening except at the top, so I have to assume this bike isn't going anywhere with thieves OR it owner.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
It'll take a bigger man than me to attempt such a daring robbery. At least during the daylight hours when climbing up that thing makes you into a spectacle. Maybe it'll be better under the cover of darkness.
Or maybe bike thieves will just always prefer the lower hanging fruit (the bikes already on the ground).
![]() |
| from here (image source) |
If you've never tried to lift one of those signs before you should give it a try. You might be surprised, and you'll probably never use them like this ever again.
![]() |
| from here (image source) |
If there WAS supposed to be a bike attached to that then you clearly locked the wrong part.
| from here and here (image source) |
I think this is what they call foreshadowing. Look down and despair at your future, cyclist.
| from here and here (image source) |
Of course there's also a bike lock in there (at least it looks like one, though it's hard to tell with all that webbing in the way) so this bike is double protected.
| from here (image source) |
If the first lock doesn't stop the theft, the second and third aren't going to do it either. They're just the same preventative measure repeated multiple time. Best case scenario is if you put a ridiculous number of locks on it then maybe the thief will just consider it too annoying to steal.
If you're going to use multiple preventative measures it would be better to make them different so that if one fails maybe another won't.
![]() |
| from here (image source) |
This kind of thing may work for horses, but it doesn't really make sense for bicycles.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
If you want to lose a megabike of information, this seems like the way to do it.
![]() |
| found on Funny Junk |
Sometimes we use security controls more out of habit than anything else. We forget why they're there and why we need them and so we sort of go through the motions and don't get any benefits as a result.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
Just in case the bee infestation isn't enough to deter would-be thieves, there's a perfectly good non-infested bike right beside it that would probably be less of a hassle to steal.
![]() |
| from here (image source) |
Pretty sure that lock could just fall off if you turned the handle bars the right way.
![]() |
| from here (image source) |
You're not going to get very far in your defenses if you can't see all dimensions of the threat landscape.
![]() |
| from here and here (image source) |
Of course it's also a good idea to keep alternative threat models in mind too. No one will be riding off with this, but they could certainly carry it away, and that lock looks like you could just slip it over the top of the seat.
![]() |
| from here (image source) |